Webinar for West, Tuesday February 21 – Avoid a Viral Nightmare: Ethically Managing Your Presence on the Web

Posted by – February 19, 2012

On Tuesday, February 21, I am presenting a Webinar for West. The topic is “Avoid a Viral Nightmare: Ethically Managing Your Presence on the Web.”  Aside from the fact I have a cold so my voice will sound funny, this is a good chance to hear my seminar addressing issues of ethics and controlling your reputation online. Thus far, whenever I have presented on this topic, attorneys have found the information very useful. I will alter the content for West, somewhat, but generally speaking I will be addressing many of the ethical issues as well as showing some cases in which attorneys have gotten themselves in trouble via social media.

If you attend, I hope you find the seminar both enjoyable and educational. It is always my goal when I teach that the audience members can leave, or in this case log onto their computers, and immediately implement something new.

For details see http://westlegaledcenter.com/program_guide/course_detail.jsf?courseId=44949714

The Bad Jennifer Ellis is Back! She comes along with Convergent, Sprint and AT&T to torment me. So who wants to handle the lawsuit?

Posted by – February 17, 2012

If you follow this blog, you might recall that I wrote about the bad, bad, Jennifer Ellis who doesn’t pay her bills. This Jennifer, when I first became aware of her, owed Ford a car and Sprint $300 or so. Now apparently she owes AT&T some money too. The statement actually says Palisades Collection, but Convergent tells me that it is for AT&T Wireless. I actually got a call from a private detective at one point threatening me over the car.  I called him back and said if you call me again or threaten me again, you will be the defendant in a lawsuit. He didn’t call me again. Go figure.

At any rate, sometime early last year I got a call from Ford asking me to pay for a car. We quickly realized they had the wrong Jennifer Ellis, chuckled about it and moved on. Some time later, I started to get texts from Sprint saying I owed money. I called Sprint, rather confused (I do have a Sprint account) and was told, oh no, you don’t owe money. And I moved on. Then the phone calls and letters started. I returned the calls to the collection company, ERSolutions, we established there was another another Jennifer Ellis, and as I said, that she is bad, bad, bad. ERSolutions removed my address from their system. When I called Sprint I actually had to scream at the customer service rep (high level mind you) to get the situation resolved.

Well, here we are again. It is now almost a year later, and the letters are back. Not only is it Sprint, now it is apparently AT&T. I am not sure who connected the AT&T account with my address.

I called into Convergent, spoke to a nice man, reminded him of the situation, and also, that I don’t actually need to hire a lawyer, being one and all. He put me through to Valerie, who at first had the audacity to tell me that I owed money. I interrupted her to say, excuse me, you just lied, you know I don’t owe the money, so in addition to the other violations of the federal act, you just committed another one. She was quiet for a moment and then said, you are on hold. She was considerably more polite upon her return. She confirmed neither account was mine and would make sure my information would be removed.

Right now I am on the phone with Sprint. I am keeping my temper, so far, but they are at least being very nice and apologetic. I first spoke to Tabatha. Now I am speaking to Leslie. Leslie has put me on hold so she can go speak to their financial group. Now I am speaking with Nancy. Nancy is looking for someone else. She is thinking she might need to send me to legal. I said well, sooner or later, because I’m gonna sue you. Now I am with Felicia. Felicia says nothing of mine is on the bad Jennifer’s account and that my information was removed. So I can only assume Sprint told Convergent to try again, and Convergent, for whatever reason came after me.  Felicia told me she would have the situation reviewed again just to make sure I won’t have any more problems. I am sure she will forgive me my lack of faith. I reminded her too that I would be considering my legal options.

Why did I tell everyone I am considering suing them? Well, I am actually hoping someone from Sprint’s legal will be informed of this and I will get a call. I would like an explanation and a promise of resolution.

I think at this point, we have had enough violations for me to pursue a lawsuit. None of these companies have offered much in terms of the waste of time and aggravation. I think Sprint gave me a tiny discount at some point, I would have to look. I don’t want to handle a suit myself. Any takers? I am in Pennsylvania. If you are interested, send me an email at jennifer@freedmanlpm.com.  Fair warning, if I do decide to go forward, I’ll blog about it.

CLE and CE Speakers – What kind of ratings should you be after?

Posted by – February 16, 2012

I just had an interesting Facebook conversation with Sean Carter, a professional speaker, and Cecil Caulkins, a Facebook friend who shows me you don’t need to meet in person to become real friends.  I hired Sean when I worked for PBI, he is a wonderful speaker and I respect what he has to say. Cecil is retired from the CLE business, but much like my first boss, Roger Meilton, he is one of the grand men of CLE and so his opinion is incredibly valuable. The topic was about a seminar I had just completed, but it ended up making me think about what those scoring sheets that you fill out at CLE events and how providers and speakers should and do receive them.

I will digress to note, if you have ever wondered where I get my topics, Facebook conversations are often a great source.

CLE Rating

When you go to a CLE event, or most continuing education events I imagine, you are provided with a sheet that asks for your opinion. You might wonder why the provider hands that sheet out, and you might even completely ignore it, but the opinion sheet is actually quite important to any good CE provider. In Pennsylvania, the CLE Board requires all providers to ask specific questions at each program, and to report back the numeric information. But a good provider isn’t just going to ask those basic questions, she is going to want to know more information about how you received the seminar. Attendee opinions as to the quality of the seminar, written materials, facility in which the event is offered, and most importantly the individual speakers, is incredibly important, and a good provider will take note of what you write down.

Put the Scores in Perspective

When I worked for PBI, I was one of the few employees who not only created seminars, but spoke. Now, when I first started speaking, I was always quite scared, these days I still am, but not to the level I experienced when I was in my late 20s. One of the reasons I was exceptionally nervous is because I knew that when I spoke, Roger looked at every evaluation to see how I was doing. Now this isn’t to say Roger gave my speaking undue attention, he looked through all of the evaluations for every course because he took them seriously, but I knew I would have heard about it if there was a problem. And rightly so. Roger asked me to speak the first time because he thought I would be good at it. He continued to allow me to speak because I got good scores.

I used to joke with other speakers that they didn’t need to worry about  evaluations the way I did. I would say, “hey, look at it this way, you can only be a little embarrassed, I could get fired.” Now, that was a joke, I knew the worst that would have happened is that Roger would have asked me what was going on, but it does put the speaker scores into perspective for the average, non-professional speaker. It always helped with their nerves. On the other hand, the professional speaker, the one who gets paid, will get fired if he gets bad scores, so those scores are a pretty serious thing.

How do Providers Look at the Scores?

I forget who it was, but I remember a professional speaker who told me he never paid attention to the scores and just looked at the comments. I remember being surprised, because while comments are very useful, numerical ratings show a trend that can be a good guide as to whether a speaker should be invited back.

As a provider and a speaker, I appreciate comments. If someone was offended I want to know about it. If someone really enjoyed the seminar, I want to know about that too. Also, the quotes are wonderful for marketing purposes. If someone is going to pay me to speak, he wants to know what people think about me. I can easily share good quotes to let people know, yes I am a good speaker and you can safely put the reputation of your company in my hands.

When I was retaining professional speakers for PBI, I wanted those quotes, because they told me the person was a good speaker, but they also told the audience that he was as well. CE attendees are always looking for proof that a speaker is interesting and I would always put that information on the brochure. But I also called other providers who used the person before I hired him to make certain he was a good speaker. When I had concerns the provider normally had no problem sharing the scores with me.

The thing is though, as both a speaker and a provider, while I like the quotes and I appreciate any constructive criticism, what I really am looking for is objective trends. Some speakers and providers obsess over individual scores. I do not. As a provider, if I see that a speaker got a 1 (the worst score) I wonder what happened, but if all of the rest of the scores are 4s or 5s (the best) then I figure the person just didn’t like the speaker, was having a bad day, or really hates CLE. However, if I see a bunch of 1s and 2s, I see a trend that really worries me and I am not likely to invite the speaker back. As a speaker, if I ever saw a bunch of 1s and 2s I would be very disappointed in myself, think about what went wrong, and immediately try to fix it.

What Do Providers Want to See?

I can only speak for myself, but I think that I am probably in the ballpark when I say,  for a non-professional speaker, I was happy if I saw a lot of 3s, impressed if I saw a lot of 4s, and amazed if I saw a lot of 5s. For a professional speaker, I expected to see mainly 4s with a sprinkling of 3s and 5s.  If a non-professional speaker really had the knowledge, but was just boring so he got a lot of 2s and 3s, I would try to work with that speaker to see if we could improve presentation. If a professional speaker got mainly 2s and 3s, I wouldn’t invite him back. It is hard for non-professional speakers to learn to speak well. After all, speaking is one of the greatest fears out there, and most people just don’t have the knack to be great speaker. I never expected non-professionals to have the skill of professionals.

What Do I Want to See for Myself?

For myself, I like to see 4s and 5s, and that is generally what I have seen from when I first started speaking. Of course, I wasn’t a professional speaker when I started, but we are our own worst critics and have a tendency to expect more from ourselves than we expect from someone else. And this is actually what lead to this post. I mentioned that when I spoke yesterday for PBI on the subject of Social Media for the Elder Law Attorney, I got one 4 and everything else was a 5. Sean said “you go girl!” and Cecil said “[Y]ou have already advanced to the realm of smart speakers. The dumb ones would be obsessing about the person who rated you 4 instead of 5.” I cannot say if I would obsess over getting a 1 or a 2, because I never have gotten one. I think I might, and at the least I would wonder what went wrong. But I have never obsessed over a 3 or a 4, simply because, with my experience as a provider, I know some people just don’t believe in giving a 5 and some people will never give a high score. I simply don’t take it seriously. Nor should any speaker.

What Should You Want to See as a Speaker?

I have written previously about becoming a CLE speaker (and being invited back) and one thing that matters is scores. I am being redundant, but I think if you are a professional speaker, you should be looking for mainly 4s and 5s, and as a non-professional you should be looking for 3s. As a non-professional, if you get a lot of 4s and 5s you can guarantee you will be invited back, finding non-professional speakers who get scores like that makes a seminar coordinator very happy indeed. For the professional speaker, you may or may not be invited back with good scores, your return depends not only on the scores, but the number of attendees and the budget.

Conclusion

As a speaker, you should never obsess over your scores, but you certainly should take them seriously. Never let a negative comment or a low score hurt your feelings, sometimes people are just taking a bad day out on you.

If you are a paid speaker you should ask for quotes for marketing purposes, but you should ask for your average number too, it will give you a lot of information. As a non-paid speaker, if you want to be invited to speak a lot, you should focus on developing your skills as a speaker so you can obtain 3s and 4s. If you want to be invited to speak a lot, work hard to improve so you can obtain those 4s and 5s.

How do you improve? One way is to ask your provider for advice. Another way is to hire a coach or attend a course on professional speaking. One speaker I know does a great job of training speakers on how to speak is Faith Pincus. You can find her website here.

 

Social Media for Employers

Posted by – February 15, 2012

Tomorrow I am speaking for the PASAE in Harrisburg.  My topic is social media for employers.  I am addressing issues including: general use of social media; risks and rewards of using social media for screening, hiring, and firing; best practices for social media policies; and privacy settings on the most popular sites.

If you are interested, you may view my powerpoint on my Scribd page.

Office 365′s Rule Limitations Are Really %$#!ing Me Off

Posted by – February 15, 2012

When I joined Ellen, one of the first things I did was to move us to cloud based Exchange for eamil.  At the time the service was called BPOS.

As I was setting up the service, Ellen mentioned to me that her rules had not been operating correctly. Emails were not ending up where they belonged. We both hoped that moving to Exchange would solve the problem. It didn’t, actually the problem seemed worse. But this time I had an error message to work with, which lead me to be able to identify the problem.

It seems that Outlook (the program) has a limited amount of space for rules, 64k.  Ellen, a power user of Outlook, not too surprisingly, uses a lot of rules.  She had reached the maximum in the program, and frankly, was wondering if she was going a bit crazy from missing emails. I don’t understand why Outlook doesn’t have some kind of message when you reach the memory cap.  The reason the problem was worse in BPOS is because BPOS only provided 32k of space for rules.

I immediately contacted Microsoft and they upped Ellen’s space to 64k, but given she was having problems already at that space, I knew it wouldn’t be enough. The representative at Microsoft had to ask special permission, we had to prove we had optimized the rules and that Ellen really needed the memory.  It took about a month and a lot of pestering on my part, but finally I got the rules limitation raised to 128k. If there is rule Nirvana, this was it.

Unfortunately, about a month ago we were forced to move to Office 365 and the problem immediately returned. It seems that in its wisdom, Microsoft upped the rule memory to 64k for everybody, but completely removed any ability to raise the memory higher. I had a good bit of back and forth with tech support about this, but essentially was blown off.

I contacted some folks at Microsoft with whom I had spoken for other reasons, they were more than willing to chat with me and were as helpful as they could be. Ellen wrote them a strongly worded email about the importance of rules and the ability to use them. The folks at Microsoft were surprised to find out how many people complained about the rule memory limitation, apparently the problem had already been noted.  They told me they would file a special “bug” report with Microsoft, offer a business reason as to why the limitation should be changeable on a case-by-case basis, and would be in touch as soon as they had an answer.

This, of course, leaves Ellen, along with other heavy rule users, in a very bad situation. I was told by Microsoft that we should shorten the names of the rules, because this would free up some memory. I did so, changing all of the rules to, at most, 2 letters. This still didn’t solve the problem. I also followed all other suggestions by Microsoft, still not good enough. So here we are, waiting for Microsoft to fix the problem so Ellen can use rules the way they are meant to be used.

Ellen has written a post about this from the perspective of the individual who is greatly impacted by this limitation. I commend it to you because it is excellent reading.

If you have the same concern, consider emailing Microsoft and letting them know that the rule memory limitation, both in Office itself as well as 365, is really much too low and should be increased.  The more people who contact Microsoft about this problem the better. The phone number for Microsoft support is  (866) 764 5574 and the website is http://support.microsoft.com/. Tell them Ellen sent you.